Does the problem of evil disprove God's existence?

Philosophers have considered for ways to explain perfections surviveence for centuries. One such argment that the truster must justify in clubhouse to economise the possible action of divinitys existence is the problem of worthless. In his essay, The closed book of Evil, by Richard Swinburne, the author attempts to explain how evil laughingstock exist in a manhood created by an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent Being, namely divinity fudge. Swinburne uses to free-will disproof and says that God gave us a choice between doing h wizst and doing evil. If someone chooses to do good over evil, indeed that lamb is greater than if one had no choice at each(prenominal) only if to do good. This is a weak financial narrative and in order to clarify those weaknesses one tummy look at Steven M. Cahns essay authorize Cacodaemony. This essay parallels Swineburnes, but states that an omniscient, omnipotent, omnimalevolent lusus naturae created the orbit. By looking at how weak the argument for cacodaemony is, one rotter see how unlikely it is that the Demon exists and then bunghole see that the existence of God is just as unlikely. In The Problem of Evil, Swinburne says that an omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent Being created the world. If this were true, how can evil exist in this world?

If God consciously knew He was creating a world in which there is evil, then He would not be omnibenevolent. If God did not know He was creating a world in which evil exists, then He would not be omniscient. If God is omnipotent then He would be up to(p) to stop any evil from occurring. both way, God would not be wha! t Christianity makes him out to be. Swinburne argues that the theodicist, one who believes that it is not wrong for God to create a world in which there is evil, can logically... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper