Opposing Viewpoints- Vegetarianism Essay

When it comes to view extremums there volition always be an debate side. You must develop your strongly foc pulmonary tuberculosisd opinion with examples and/or reasons. In order for a reader to accept your side you must utilize clear, powerful, and direct language to really capture them. Express your opinion clearly, and thus base it on factual, researched or first-hand information. Hard facts and first-hand consume are so convincing to readers. The way to convince your audience to accept your opinion is by the combination of ethos, logos, and pathos appeals. These appeals are required for successfully appealing to the amount reader and getting your point across in the most impressive way possible. The vegetarianism lifestyle can be adopted for many distinct reasons. Aside from the main decision of preventing the cruel treatment of animals, many flock choose this lifestyle for health reasons. Winston Craig supports this reasoning in his essay Plant-Based Diets tolerate Many wellness Benefits, while Ben Kim argues that this kind of diet causes many health problems in A morose Vegetarian Diet Is Unhealthy for Most People. Their opinions, back up by facts, makes each case convincing.The credibility of these writers and their sources make for a big(p) ethos appeal. Both writers are creditable given that Craig is a professor of feeding at Andrews University and Kim as a chiropractor having first-hand experience with once being a vegetarian. Craig refers to specific studies and scientific literature to rest his case. While Kim uses his personal experience with vegetarianism. Kim also spent succession interviewing someone that was a part of an brass that promotes vegetarianism instead of capitalizing on hard facts.In this aspect Craig was definitely more convincing. As telling as first-hand experience is, when it comes to health each soul is different. Just because Kim experienced these health problems doesnt necessarily mean every vegetarian wil l. Kim didnt use statistics as proof and that really weakened his viewpoint. some other weaknesses in Kims argument is that the organization he spent time interviewing was more concentrate on the prevention of cruel animal treatment instead of human health. Kim should have added just a few statistics to lace his standpoint and ethos appeal.Both Craig and Kim use logos as their strongest persuasion device. Craig captures readers by presenting hard facts with parts and numbers. He states that the vegetarian life-style is consistently associated with lower blood squelch and cholesterol levels a bulky with less obesity and comprehendt disease. Craig also refers to studies that spread come forth vegetarians have one-half the risk of crab louse and have a 35-44 percent lower risk of overall mortality. This information triples as a logos, pathos, and ethos appeal. This shows Craigs credibility, its completely logical, and it even gets to the readers emotions a little by making the m speculate about their own diet and how the should improve it and lengthen their own lives by doing so. Craig presents more hard facts such as, The total direct medical be in the United States attributable to meat consumption were estimated to be $30-60 one million million a year, based upon the higher prevalence of hypertension, heart disease, cancer, diabetes, gallstones, obesity and food-borne distemper among omnivores compared with vegetarians(Craig).Thats a good point that you wouldnt necessarily turn over about. Kim states, My experiences with my own body and in providing health care to many hatful over the years have led me to believe that a long term, strict vegetarian diet is likely to lead to the development of nutritional deficiencies and profound health problems for most people. This sounds reasonable with protein as a necessity the pretermit of meat would have to have an effect on the human body. He is a chiropractor and maybe he has seen patients with signific ant health problems from their vegetarian diet, but he didnt mention anything specific just that he has had experience. Craig mentions dry beans and lentils as great alternatives to meat that will prevent these nutrition deficiencies. Overall Kims use of logos appeal could use some work.Another chew over they both use to strengthen their stance is pathos. The authors use this device to perpetrate the readers emotions. Kim brings up the cruel treatment of animals raised for food. It is understandable that he was difficult to get the readers emotions going here, but honestly it is quite off topic. His point was to inform his audience how vegetarianism is actually not the healthiest choice. He brings up some other point that the long term affects are what you have to watch out for.That is a good example of pathos, the readers dont want to hear that their eating habits will seriously affect them in the long run. Craigs use of pathos comes in when he mentioned that over two vita min C studies have proved that vegetarians have one-half the risk of cancer. The topic of cancer always pulls on heart strings. Just about everyone knows someone that has been moved(p) by cancer. Both authors mention some information that they know will get an emotion response out of their audience.While both authors establish the same topic, their valid viewpoints differ. In the end, Craig more successfully convinced his readers to have got his side on this issue. His hard facts and his credibility by far outshines that of Kim. Although Kim makes use of the persuasive appeals, overall his perspective isnt completely clear or reasonable. All in all, Craig did an excellent job developing his strongly focused opinion through the use of pathos, logos, and ethos.Works CitedCraig, Winston. Plant-Based Diets Provide Many health Benefits. Vegetarianism. Debra A. Miller. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Rpt. from Health Benefits of Vegetarian Diets. Vegetarianism a nd Vegetarian Nutrition, 2008. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2014.Kim, Ben. A Strict Vegetarian Diet Is Unhealthy for Most People. Vegetarianism. Debra A. Miller. Detroit Greenhaven Press, 2010. Current Controversies. Rpt. from Dont let Philosophy Become More Important Than What Works. Chet Days Health & Beyond. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 2 Oct. 2014.